The Smokescreen
Badgery's Creek had been the officially preferred second sydney
airport site since the 1984 Labor government's Second Airport Site
Selection EIS chose it ahead of Wilton and 8 other sites within the
Sydney basin.
However, in 1989 the Labor government decided to build a Third
Runway at KSA, thereby deferring major work at Badgery's Creek for
10 years (only a 1800 m general aviation runway would be
constructed initially at Badgerys).
The KSA Third Runway was opened in 1994 - and created a furore
amongst the vast numbers of inner city residents that became newly
exposed to unrelenting waves of aircraft noise.
In May 1996, the Howard Liberal Government commenced an EIS
process for a second airport site either at Badgery's Creek or
Holsworthy (the site which ran last in 1984). As a result of fierce
community reaction, the Holsworthy option was abandoned in July
1997.
Behind the Smokescreen
With these decoys distracting the community, Bankstown Airport was
being quiety expanded from early 1996 in what looks like
preparation for a much bigger role . Runways were lengthened, and
construction started on earthworks where one day new freight
facilities will magically appear. Bankstown's main runway is now a
3C runway (ICAO classification), when prior to 1996 it was 2C.
This has occurred quietly, without any EIS processes, and
airport managers deny the extensions in spite of comprehensive
evidence of it (see Aerial
Photos and Airport for
Sale). You could be forgiven for thinking that the
Holsworthy/Badgery Ck kerfuffle is just a smokescreen designed to
hide the real game being played out without any regard for
environmental consequences at Bankstown and KSA.
Finance Minister John Fahey's acquisition of the control of the
airport had the alarm bells ringing loudly throughout Bankstown and
the areas affected by KSA, in view of some of his public statements.
The
independent auditor's
report on the EIS process was not released until the 30th
January, 1998 (yes, they misled the public when they promised it
would be released within 2 weeks of the Draft EIS release). It
found serious flaws.
John Fahey, Minister
for Finance, and member for the very marginal
electorate that includes the Badgerys Site,
responded:
|
"I will want to be 100 per cent convinced by the EIS process
that construction of the second airport at Badgerys Creek is worth
the environmental costs... I have to say that after careful reading
of both the draft EIS and the SMEC audit, I remain a long way short
of being even halfway convinced"
|
John Fahey
Suggests
Bankstown
|
|
Fahey said he had major reservations about the adverse effects on
the community from proceeding with the development, and
"would need to be satisfied the existing airport
at Bankstown could not instead perform a similar function"
Daily Telegraph, 2nd February 1998
This made the Liberal member for the electorate of Lowe, Paul
Zammit, so nervous he made straight for the Prime Minister's office
to threaten resignation. Lowe is an inner Sydney electorate where
residents peace has been shattered by the new "share the noise"
policy introduced at Kingsford Smith Airport. Subsequently, Mr
Zammit resigned from the Liberal Party, claiming his leader was
sabotaging Lowe to save his own electorate (Bennelong). Mr Zammit,
standing as an Independent, then lost his seat in the following
Federal Election.
In the January 1998, the Labor Party's Federal Conference did
little better. It reaffirmed its support for a second airport in
Sydney, while expressing confusing doubts about the merits of
Badgerys Creek.
On Friday 27th February, a meeting of the Local Government
Association did however come out in opposition to the Badgerys
Creek proposal, and called for a site out of the Sydney Basin.
Apparently, due to continued support for Badgerys Creek from some
inner city councils, the vote was a close one.
On the same day, the Federal Minister for Transport was talking
at a tourism industry breakfast. Under the headline "No Second
Airport until 2006", the Sydney Morning Herald's Robert Wainwright
reported (SMH, 28th February 1998)
Cabinet was due to choose a site for the airport in December,
pressured by demands for it to be finished by 2003, but the
Minister for Transport, Mr Vaile, admitted yesterday ... at a
tourism industry breakfast: "I don't think we
will have a decision by the election. The process will go into some
time next year". This represents the first public
confirmation that the Federal Liberal Party believes it is
politically dangerous to further alienate voters in key western
Sydney seats
In fact, the process went until Dec 2000, when the Federal
Government claimed it was deferring the Badgery's Creek
proposal. By July 2003, it was clear that Badgery's had been abandoned, and in August
2003 SACL's
masterplan for KSA claimed there was no need for a second
airport.
A survey by Western Sydney Council's (June, 1998) indicated 13% of
voters would support Pauline Hanson's One Nation. Some 26% of those
affected by the airport would vote for minor parties. These results
hit home, within weeks of the Queensland Liberal & National
Parties being savaged by supporters swinging to Hanson in droves.
Appearing on Nine Network's Sunday program (July 12th, 1998), Mr
Fahey said
"I believe there are environmental concerns that have been
thrown up to date that make it almost insurmountable for an airport
to be built at Badgerys Creek"
Mr Fahey also linked the demise of the airport with the
construction of a very fast train between Sydney and Canberra.
"To me, that gives options that weren't available when we set
about to do a proper study, which Labor never did, on the Badgerys
Creek nomination for a second Sydney airport" , he said.
"If that evaluation allows the Government to proceed with a very
fast train, it provides an option outside the Sydney basin that
wasn't there a year ago"
The very fast train proposal had been around for much more than
a year. So had the offshore proposal being promoted now by Liberal
Jackie Kelly, whose Lindsay electorate is literally across the road
from Badgerys Creek.
Nevertheless, it was satisfying to hear echoes of what
anti-airport campaigners have been saying for all these years.
Especially the emphasis on out of the Sydney Basin (which still has
not made it as official Labor policy either).
In a report from the Daily Telegraph, 13th July 1998, ACT Chief
Minister Kate Carnell suggests that a VFT might allow Canberra
airport to fulfill the second airport role. Canberra's airport was
quietly upgraded to International status, in May this year.
Canberra Airport Manager John Milton was quick to talk up the
benefits of adding 600 meters of runways and a railway terminus to
maximise his shareholder value.
The 17th July, 1998 ABC Stateline program provided a good debate
on Badgery's Creeks Pros & Cons
.
State Libs Dump Badgerys
By the 2nd August, 1998, the Sunday Telegraph reported:
Opposition baulks at Badgerys
- By Sonia Milohanic
THE NSW Opposition has withdrawn support for an airport at
Badgerys Creek in a significant snub to the Federal Government.
Instead it supports consideration of Goulburn as the site for the
second airport.
The move was immediately undermined by Federal Transport
Minister Mark Vaile and attacked as "the backflip of all time" by
the NSW Government. A spokesman for Mr Vaile confirmed the
government's commitment to Badgerys Creek as the preferred airport
site, subject to a satisfactory environmental study.
The dilemna for Liberal voters was whether these transient
outbreaks of good sense would spread to other cabinet ministers and
take permanent hold. The 13th July Daily Telegraph reported that
spokesman for Transport Minister Mark Vaile said the Government's
position on Badgerys Creek had not changed.
Events at the August 16, 1999 cabinet meeting to decide on the
Second Airport issue suggest that the good sense was just a
transient illusion. Cabinet has fallen for the short-sighted and
politically expedient dumping on Bankstown plans.
While the Holsworthy proposal was just plain stupid, outrage
over it provided a smoke screen that has hidden the shortcomings of
the Badgerys Creek options and do nothing or Bankstown expansion
options.
Now that the smokescreen hiding Badgerys is lifted, will
Badgerys Creek and Holsworthy opponents be satisfied to rest on
their success ? Or will their great Aussie sense of a fair
go see them equally angered by any threat to others within
urban areas ?
ABC
News, Monday, 1 September 2003:
Canberra International Airport is promoting itself as the
solution to Sydney's airport woes.
In newspaper advertisements today, the airport's management
claims Canberra could become Sydney's second airport.
It claims Canberra already has the capacity to be an alternative
to the transit delays in Sydney, with no need of a night
curfew.
The airport's managing director Stephen Byron says Canberra
already handles over 120 flights a day connecting with major
capital cities.
"The traffic to Sydney should be reserved for those who need to
fly in and out of Sydney and Sydney will no longer [need] to
function as a domestic hub for Australia," he said.
Canberra Business Council says says the Federal Government
should seriously consider the option, given both major parties are
opposed to the Badgery's Creek site.
But Christopher Brown from the tourism and transport lobby group
TTF Australia says Canberra airport is too far away.
"Sydney's going to need proper planning in the distant future
when a second airport is needed probably somewhere within a closer
range of the centre of Sydney," he said.
But leaving the decision to the distant future (as per TTF
remarks) will probably mean that sites even more distant than
Badgery's Creek and Wilton will have to be considered. In 20 years
time, Sydney's urban sprawl will ensure that Wilton will be no more
acceptable than Badgery's Creek is now.
The TTF dreams of expanding KSA and Bankstown. But no other city
in the world (the size of Sydney or bigger) would contemplate the
cross-subsidization needed to sustain an airport of 64 million
passengers per year capacity within 10 km of its CBD.
Badgery's Creek passed the EIS tests, but failed to meet the
Liberal's political agenda. There's now a great threat that the
do-nothing option of expanding the existing Kingsford Smith Airport
will follow.
It's very questionable whether any upgrading of Canberra airport
would offload KSA sufficiently, or prevent spill-over into
Bankstown and other general aviation airprots.
By September 2003, the Badgery's Creek proposal looked well and
truly dead in the water. SACL was proposing, without any scientific
foundation that KSA could handle all the traffic until 2024 (SACL
have a vested interest in keeping competition out of their market,
and have given no guarantees as to the costs of their proposal).
And the Federal Government was keeping Bankstown Airport expansion
options well and truly open.
Expansion of KSA is likely to require transfer of large
commercial jets to Bankstown
Airport and other general aviation airports in the Sydney basin
(see Dana Dumps on Bankstown and Bankstown's Olympic Role ). By large
commercial jets, we could be talking 737's and 767 (see runway details).
The only way to get rid of the threats of ever increasing
aircraft noise is to build a second airport in the right place.
Lands and existing airports within the Sydney Basin are not the
right place.
See survey to have your
say on where you think is right. Then write to our politicians and
tell them how to set it right.
"Governments have almost zero foresight and
an almost infinite capacity for stupidity, violence and
destruction. Not quite, but almost infinite capacity. The not-quite
is when people get mad enough to stand in the way."
- Leslie Parrish-Bach
First Published 2nd February, 1998. Last
Revised
Last Change: vdeck mod
Visitor
since Sat 21-Feb-2004.